You can post the email, just not identifiable information. Usually we do it to clarify work or show bonuses, but I don't know why a negative interaction would be any different, so long as we are judicious in how we deal with the information. I'm so sorry you had that experience. All of mine are just staring at me and taunting me. I wonder if anyone contacted her department, perhaps this is why mine are stalled. I am a doctoral candidate, so I am pretty certain that I completed them within the set of regulations given, but I am not super human either. Itchy reject fingers go on my block list. I assumed, perhaps incorrectly, that a smooth qual experience would result in a smooth batch for a week or so. I have not noticed the hits being posted again either. Hopefully, if she is not getting what she is looking for, she will reach out, communicate, rework the hit. If I get rejections I will probably suggest that she reach out via one of the forums to communicate with the worker base regarding common mistakes and what she is really seeking. I have a hard time believing that multiple workers with high stats decided to perform hits in a totally shit manner out of the blue.
first - congrats on being a doctoral candidate!!!! i recently switched careers & am almost done w grad school, possibly considering doctoral next. yeah, I was really turned off by her response especially because I made numerous efforts to reach out to her about possible mistakes on my part and asking if I could fix any errors, etc.
I emailed her immediately about the possible mistakes & she wrote back to say
"Sorry for the delay in responding. I understand your concern. I checked a couple of your entries and see what you are saying. I have approved most of them - so you will be paid for these and won't hit your rating. "
I told her thank you and I had actually already received the rejections, would it be possible to fix them, etc. & got back
"Sorry for the late reply. So, I checked your stats again. This is what I have: (my stats as a graphic:13 correct/38 wrong/11 rejected)
The ones marked wrong are those that looked like the MTurker made a good attempt, but still missed the mark - so those are paid out, but still unusable for our purposes.
The ones marked reject are those that appear like no effort has been made - these are not paid out.
I am quite surprised that you did 60+ when all we required was 5.
The wrong and rejected ones were re uploaded and completed by other workers. So, unfortunately, at this point, there is not much I can do. Thanks for the feedback on the HITs."